A landmark decision by a US court has established that art generated by
artificial intelligence (AI) cannot be granted copyright protection. The
ruling stems from a case that questioned the eligibility of AI-generated
artworks for copyright claims. The court’s decision is based on the
argument that copyright requires human creativity, which AI lacks. This
ruling has significant implications for the art world, as it raises
questions about authorship, ownership, and the future of AI-generated
content in terms of legal rights and intellectual property.
artificial intelligence (AI) cannot be granted copyright protection. The
ruling stems from a case that questioned the eligibility of AI-generated
artworks for copyright claims. The court’s decision is based on the
argument that copyright requires human creativity, which AI lacks. This
ruling has significant implications for the art world, as it raises
questions about authorship, ownership, and the future of AI-generated
content in terms of legal rights and intellectual property.
